“Brentano's Dual-Framing Theory of Consciousness.” Forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

I offer an interpretation of Brentano's theory of consciousness that makes it a particularly subtle version of self-representationalism. The subtlety derives from certain mereological innovations of Brentano's.

“The Three Circles of Consciousness.” Forthcoming in M. Guillot and M. Garcia-Carpintero (eds.), The Sense of Mineness, OUP.

This one is a big-picture paper articulating a view of phenomenal properties as coming in three concentric circles: content-based phenomenal properties, attitude-based phenomenal properties, and for-me-ness.

“Beyond the Neural Correlates of Consciousness.” Forthcoming in U. Kriegel (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.

I present a scheme for taxonomizing philosophical theories of consciousness by the different accounts they give of the relationship between consciousness and its neural correlate.

(With Anna Giustina.) “Fact-Introspection, Thing-Introspection, and Inner Awareness.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2017): 143-164.

We argue that the combination of two ideas leads to the conclusion that there is a kind of introspection that is infallible. One idea is that there's an important distinction between fact-introspection (introspecting that p) and thing-introspection (introspecting x). The other is the model of introspection suggested by the self-representational theory of consciousness.

“Prιcis of The Varieties of Consciousness.” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 7 (2016): 240-246.

This is a prιcis of my Varieties book; it does the usual.

“Towards a New Feeling Theory of EmotionEuropean Journal of Philosophy 22 (2014): 420-442.

I argue that when properly developed, a feeling theory of emotion can overcome the standard objections leveled in the literature. The key is to portray emotional feelings as rather complex, involving cognitive and conative phenomenology.

“Prιcis of Subjective Consciousness: A Self-Representational Theory.” Philosophical Studies 159 (2012): 443-445. (See also "Reply to Critics" from the same issue.)

This is a Precis of my book on consciousness for a Philosophical Studies symposium. It does the usual. There is also a "Reply to Critics" that goes with it...

“Self-Representationalism and the Explanatory Gap.” In J. Liu and J. Perry, Consciousness and the Self: New Essays (pp. 51-75). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

I present an initially promising self-representationalist approach to the problem of the explanatory gap, and consider what I take to be the deepest challenge to it, namely, an objection due to Joe Levine that I call the "just more representation" objection.

“Self-Representationalism and PhenomenologyPhilosophical Studies 143 (2009): 357-381.

I offer a formulation of the phenomenological argument for the self-representationalist theory of consciousness, and defend the theory from certain phenomenological challenges, including the transparency of experience.

(With Terry Horgan.) “Phenomenal Epistemology: What is Consciousness that We may Know It so WellPhilosophical Issues 17 (2007): 123-144.

We defend two theses. The first is that there is a kind of knowledge of phenomenal experiences that is infallible. The second is that what explains this limited infallibility is a special feature of phenomenal experiences, namely, a sort of inbuilt awareness of themselves.

“The Same-Order Monitoring Theory of Consciousness.” In U. Kriegel and K. Williford (eds.), Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness (pp. 143-170). Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2006. [click here for Second Version]

Monitoring approaches to consciousness claim that a mental state is conscious when it is suitably monitored. Higher-order monitoring theory makes the monitoring state and the monitored state logically independent. Same-order monitoring theory claims a constitutive, non-contingent connection between the monitoring state and the monitored state. I articulate different versions of the same-order monitoring theory and argue for its supremacy over higher-order monitoring theory.

“Naturalizing Subjective CharacterPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2005): 23-57.

When I have an experience of the blue sky, there is a bluish it is like for me to have the experience. There are two components to this “bluish way it is like for me”: the bluish component, which I call qualitative character; and the for-me component, which I call subjective character. The paper examines six options for naturalizing subjective character.

“Consciousness and Self-consciousnessThe Monist 87 (2004): 185-209.

I distinguish two kinds of self-consciousness: transitive self-consciousness is typically reported with “x is self-conscious of thinking that p”; intransitive self-consciousness with “x is self-consciously thinking that p.” I then argue that although consciousness is completely independent of the former, there can be no consciousness in the absence of the latter.

“Moore’s Paradox and the Structure of Conscious BeliefErkenntnis 61 (2004): 99-121.

I offer a solution to Moore’ paradox according to which (i) the absurdity of Moorean assertions derives from that of conscious Moorean beliefs and (ii) the absurdity of conscious Moorean beliefs is due to the fact that conscious beliefs are self-representing, in a way that makes Moorean conscious beliefs explicitly self-contradictory.

“Consciousness as Intransitive Self-Consciousness: Two Views and an ArgumentCanadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (2003): 103-132.

This paper offers an early presentation of my master argument for the self-representational theory of consciousness, according to which a mental state is conscious iff it represents itself in the right way.

“Consciousness, Higher-Order Content, and the Individuation of VehiclesSynthese 134 (2003): 477-504.

I argue that the difference between a self-representational theory of consciousness and higher-order theory may be much smaller than might be initially thought, and that what little difference there is favors the former.

“Phenomenal ContentErkenntnis 57 (2002): 175-198.

I defend a version of Sheomaker-style representationalism about qualitative character. (Note: although this paper is couched in terms of phenomenal character, it is meant to apply only to qualitative character; I explain what I mean by distinguishing the two in “Naturalizing Subjective Character” and other places.)

“PANIC Theory and the Prospects for a Representational Theory of Phenomenal ConsciousnessPhilosophical Psychology 15 (2002): 55-64.

I argue that representationalist theories of consciousness, typified by Tye’s, may be able to account for differences among phenomenal states in representational terms, but lack the resources to account for the difference between phenomenal and non-phenomenal states in representational terms.